Full Taxonomy
104 standard automated checks
Every invoice is evaluated against the full taxonomy below. From arithmetic errors to sophisticated contract manipulation — each check is applied automatically, with evidence cited from the contract record.
17
Categories
104
Standard Checks
+16
Verification Module
Pricing, Rate & Quantity Manipulation
Rate discrepancies
Compare invoice rates to active contract/mod rate card by effective date
Use of expired rates
Detect invoice period after rate expiration or superseded modification
Unauthorized labor categories
Map billed labor categories to authorized categories
Inflated quantities or hours
Compare claimed quantities to contract caps, task order limits, or historical patterns
Duplicate quantities across periods
Detect repeated hours or tasks spanning overlapping billing windows
Billing beyond contract ceiling
Track cumulative billed vs contract ceiling / NTE amount
Improper rounding or unit inflation
Detect systematic rounding up (e.g., daily minimums not allowed by contract)
Bundled pricing masking overcharges
Decompose bundled line items vs authorized pricing structure
Duplicate, Recycled & Phantom Billing
Duplicate invoice numbers
Match invoice numbers across payment history
Duplicate line items
Pattern-match line descriptions, amounts, and periods
Rebilling previously rejected items
Compare to prior held/rejected invoices
Split invoices to avoid thresholds
Detect same work split across multiple invoices
Phantom services with no evidence of delivery
Missing acceptance artifacts or verification evidence
Timing & Period Manipulation
Early billing before acceptance
Traverse obligation graph — acceptance node unresolved
Billing before modification effective date
Compare invoice date to mod effective date
Backdated invoices
Detect invoice dates inconsistent with submission or work logs
End-of-fiscal-period timing games
Spike detection and period boundary analysis
Front-loading labor or milestones
Compare delivery curve to contract schedule
Billing outside authorized performance period
Match service dates to contract term
Scope Creep & Unauthorized Work
Out-of-scope work billed
Invoice lines fail to map to any authorized billable item
Modifications used as post-hoc justification
Mod signed after work period
Partial scope authorization abuse
Work exceeds modification’s limited authorization
Unauthorized substitutions
Detect replacement of specified deliverables or services
“Assumed approval” billing
No formal acceptance despite informal communications
Documentation & Acceptance Failures
Missing required attachments
Check invoicing instructions vs attached timesheets, reports, etc.
Invalid acceptance authority
Acceptance not from authorized role
Conditional acceptance ignored
Acceptance with conditions not yet satisfied
Acceptance evidence reused improperly
Same acceptance document reused across invoices
Self-certified acceptance
Vendor-signed acceptance where disallowed
Structural Contract Violations
Improper billing method
Compare billing format to contract pricing model (T&M vs FFP)
Unapproved reimbursables
Reimbursables not listed or capped in contract
Incorrect indirect rates or markup
Validate applied rates against contract terms
Unauthorized escalation clauses
Detect applied escalation without supporting clause
Incorrect tax handling
Compare tax treatment to contract terms
Performance & SLA Misrepresentation
SLA credits not applied
Compare SLA breaches to billing
Performance claims without evidence
Missing SLA reports or verification
Overstated uptime or availability
Verification results contradict claim
Billing during service outage
Match outage logs to billing window
Vendor Gaming & Pattern Abuse
Systematic max-billing behavior
Repeated billing at caps or ceilings
Ambiguity exploitation
Repeated “gray area” billing patterns
Chronic late documentation
Pattern of missing artifacts across invoices
Repeated rebilling cycles
High correction frequency
Cross-contract rate drift
Same vendor charging different rates improperly across contracts
Identity, Reference & Metadata Errors
Wrong contract or PO referenced
Mismatch between invoice and system metadata
Vendor identity mismatch
Name or ID inconsistency
Improper subcontractor billing
Subcontractor not authorized or approved
Assignment or novation violations
Detect unapproved assignment
Compliance, Legal & Audit Red Flags
Payment without legal authority
No valid contract or modification in force
Conflict with statutory terms
Contract clause vs invoice behavior
Repeated overrides by staff
Override ledger analysis
Payments after termination or suspension
Contract state shows inactive
Split funding violations
Invoice spans incompatible funding sources
Mathematical & Mechanical Errors
Line-item math errors
Recompute qty × unit price vs extended amount
Invoice total mismatch
Sum line items vs stated invoice total
Tax calculation errors
Recalculate tax vs stated rate
Currency or unit mismatch
Detect unit mismatch (hours vs days, USD vs other)
Duplicate tax or fee application
Detect repeated fee or tax lines
Contract Interpretation & Precedence
Wrong document precedence applied
Apply precedence clause across contract vs SOW vs modification
Superseded clause relied upon
Detect citation to overridden clause
Option period misuse
Detect billing outside exercised option
Incorrect amendment stacking
Validate cumulative effect of multiple modifications
Partial clause enforcement
Vendor applies favorable clause but ignores its constraints
Deliverable Granularity & Completion
Partial deliverable billed as complete
Compare deliverable definition vs submitted artifact
Milestone slicing
One milestone broken into multiple billings
Premature “substantial completion” claims
Acceptance language mismatch
Placeholder deliverables
Detect generic or recycled artifacts
Deliverables misaligned to invoice period
Date and artifact mismatch
Cost-Shifting & Misclassification
Reclassifying non-billable work
Detect category drift across invoices
Admin or overhead billed as labor
Pattern match descriptions against authorized categories
Travel and expense misuse
Compare to allowable cost clauses
Capital vs operating expense misuse
Compare cost type to contract terms
Acceptance Workflow Manipulation
Acceptance after invoice submission
Timestamp comparison
Retroactive acceptance
Acceptance date after work period
Acceptance under protest ignored
Acceptance language parsing
Blanket acceptance misuse
Same acceptance reused across unrelated items
Payment History & Inconsistencies
Overpayment not netted in future invoices
Detect credit absence in subsequent billing
Partial payment misapplied
Reconcile payment history
Credit memos ignored
Match credit memos to invoices
Write-offs disguised as rebilling
Pattern detection across billing history
Vendor Structural & Eligibility Violations
Vendor debarment or suspension during performance
Compare dates to eligibility lists
Insurance or bond lapse
Check required compliance artifacts
Subcontracting threshold violations
Compare subcontractor billed vs allowed percentage
Unauthorized affiliate billing
Detect entity mismatch
Embodied Verification Module
Beyond document analysis — the system independently verifies real-world claims by probing services, measuring availability, and comparing observable behavior against invoiced assertions.
Service Existence & Availability Claims
Claimed service not operational
Public endpoint or service unreachable during billed window
Claimed hours not observed
Call or probe during contracted hours
Claimed coverage not provided
Geographic or time-based probes
“Always on” service intermittently unavailable
Multi-point uptime checks
Performance Threshold Violations
SLA threshold not met
Compare probe results vs SLA clause
Response time overstated
Measure response latency independently
Capacity claims exaggerated
Load and availability sampling
Redundancy claims false
Independent availability checks
Paper Compliance, Reality Failure
Reports contradict observable behavior
Compare vendor reports vs independent probes
Acceptance based on stale evidence
Verification after acceptance
Recycled SLA reports
Identical reports across billing periods
Vendor self-attested metrics
Metrics lack independent corroboration
Location, Facility & Presence Claims
Facility not operational
Public-facing confirmation
On-site staffing claims false
Authorized call or check
Operating hours misrepresented
Time-based probes
Public service desk unavailable
Call logs and availability records